Patty's Past Columns
CATHOLICS AND CONTRACEPTION
July 23, 2009A few months ago, Father, gave an extraordinary sermon. Many of the words he used had not been spoken for years. One word was Contraception. A few angry Parishioners approached Father after Mass and threatened to leave the Parish if he ever spoke of such things again.
Most Catholics in the Church today are poorly, if ever educated about Catholic teaching on sexuality and Chastity before and after Marriage. Yet the intrinsic evil/objective immorality of contraception is and has always been a definitive teaching of our Catholic Faith.
I suspect that with 80% of Catholic people practicing some form of contraception, hearing about it can be scary and unsettling. Since Humanae Vitae was promulgated in 1968, contraception seems to be one of those elephants that we know are in the room, but have become very comfortable stepping around.
The Truth is that using contraception closes a part of you off from your marriage partner and God. It invalidates the promise you made to one another in your marriage vows, to love one another faithfully and TOTALLY without reservation.
The Catholic Church teaches,’ a couple need not desire or seek to have a child in each and every act of intercourse. And it is not wrong for a couple to have intercourse even when they know the wife is naturally infertile, but they should never act to suppress or curtail the life giving power given by God that is an integral part of what is their pledge to each other in their marriage vows’. This is what the Church means by saying that every act of intercourse must remain open to life and that contraception is objectively immoral. [married love and the gift of life…USCCB]
A husband and wife express their committed love not only with words, but with the language of their bodies. When married couples deliberately act to suppress fertility, sexual intercourse is no longer fully ‘marital’intercourse.Using contraception denies part of the meaning of married sexuality and does harm to the couples’ unity.
The Church teaching is about preserving that total mutual gift of two persons in its integrity.
For married couples, Natural Family Planning [N.F.P.] works. Modern Scientific methods of N.F.P. enable them to space the birth of their children and for sound reasons limit the size of their families in a way that is LOVINGLY OBEDIENT TO JESUS CHRIST AND HIS CHURCH, while avoiding the SIN OF CONTRACEPTION.
Thank God and pray for all priests to have the courage to speak the Truth in Love, to think with the Church and defend it.
May God bless you, your families and your marriage.
Patty MarxFor more information on N.F.P., in the Diocese of Baker, contact:
Patty Marx..541-388-4004
Pmarx@dioceseofbaker.org
July, 2009: HEALTH CARE REFORM ACTION ALERT
For decades, congress has respected the right of health care providers to decline involvement in abortion or abortion referrals - without exception. Since 2004, the Weldon Act forbids any federal agency or program to dis-criminate against individuals or institutional health care pro-viders and insurers because they decline to perform, pay for, provide coverage for or refer for abortion. Medicare and Medicaid respect the conscience rights of providers who decline to provide any abortion at all.
At this time, HR32 passed a Senate Committee and is being rushed through the U.S. House and Senate to install a nationalized health plan. This bill which is currently being passed through congress would require all insurance plans to include abortion with NO EXCEPTIONS. It mandates health networks establish new abortion providers in order to provide local access to abortion throughout the United States. This may invalidate many state laws which protect women and unborn babies as they relate to abortion [parental notice, 24 hour waiting periods, etc].
Please STOP and reflect on what this could mean to our future and the future of our children.
Considering the danger posed by the health care reform bills currently proposed, we hope you will do all in your power to educate everyone in your Parish about these issues. Please encour-age people to contact their Legislators immediately and request that abortion be explicitly excluded from the health care reform legislation.
Representative:
Greg Walden…202-225-6730
Senators:
Jeff Merkley…202-224-3753
www.merkley.senate.govRon Wyden…..202-224-5244
www.wyden.senate.gov
HEALTH REFORM BILL NEEDS MORE WORK
DESPITE NEW LANGUAGE ON ABORTION,
SAY CATHOLIC BISHOPS
Federal government must not expand its role enabling abortions
Bill should not go forward unless and until problems remedied
Protection of life, conscience rights; fairness to legal immigrants; affordability top issues
WASHINGTON--The Senate health reform bill should not move forward in its current form, Cardinal Daniel DiNardo of Galveston-Houston, Bishop William Murphy of Rockville Centre, New York, and Bishop John Wester of Salt Lake City said December 19, as senators proceeded closer to a vote. Cardinal DiNardo chairs the bishops' Committee on Pro-life Activities. Bishop Murphy chairs the bishops' Committee on Domestic Justice and Human Development. Bishop Wester chairs the bishops' Committee on Migration.
"Yesterday the bishops commented on good-faith efforts by Senator Robert Casey (D-PA) to improve the pending Senate health care reform bill on the issues of abortion and conscience rights," Cardinal DiNardo, Bishop Murphy and Bishop Wester said. "Today a Manager's Amendment was proposed to make final changes in that bill. The amendment includes some improvements from Senator Casey's proposal, including adoption tax credits and assistance for pregnant women, but differs from that proposal in other ways: It does not seem to allow purchasers who exercise freedom of choice or of conscience to "opt out" of abortion coverage in federally subsidized health plans that include such coverage. Instead it will require purchasers of such plans to pay a distinct fee or surcharge which is extracted solely to help pay for other people's abortions. Further the government agency that currently manages health coverage for federal employees will promote and help subsidize multi-state health plans that include elective abortions, contrary to longstanding law governing this agency.
Therefore, while we appreciate the good-faith efforts made by Senators Robert Casey and Ben Nelson (D-NE) to improve the bill, our judgment is the same as it was yesterday: This legislation should not move forward in its current form. It should be opposed unless and until such serious concerns have been addressed. The bishops' conference continues to study that 383-page amendment's implications from the perspective of all the bishops' moral concerns -- protection of life and conscience, affordable access to health care, and fairness to immigrants. We will continue to work vigorously for authentic health care reform that clearly reflects these fundamental principles because such reform is a public good, moral imperative and urgent national priority."
The previous day a longer statement, signed by Cardinal DiNardo, addressed the bishops' concerns. The December 18 statement follows.'ABORTION COMPROMISE' DOES NOT ADDRESS CORE PROBLEM IN SENATE HEALTH BILL, SAYS CARDINAL DINARDO, BISHOPS' PRO-LIFE CHAIR
'Compromise' would make citizens pay for others' abortions
Senate should mirror House of Representative's Hyde amendment language
Bill doesn't meet goals of affordability, fairness to legal immigrants, protection of life
WASHINGTON-Responding to reports of a new "compromise" proposal on abortion in the U.S. Senate's health care reform bill, Cardinal Daniel DiNardo today reaffirmed the position of the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops that the legislation will be morally unacceptable "unless and until" it complies with longstanding current laws on abortion funding such as the Hyde amendment. Cardinal DiNardo is Archbishop of Galveston-Houston and Chairman of the Conference's Committee on Pro-Life Activities.
The Cardinal commented on efforts by Senator Robert Casey (D-PA) to improve the Senate bill's treatment of abortion.
"Senator Casey's good-faith effort to allow individuals to 'opt out' of abortion coverage actually underscores how radically the underlying Senate bill would change abortion policy. Excluding elective abortions from overall health plans is not a privilege that individuals should have to seek as the exception to the norm. In all other federal health programs, excluding abortion coverage is the norm. And numerous opinion polls show that the great majority of Americans do not want abortion coverage."
"I welcome Senator Casey's good-faith effort to improve this bill," said Cardinal DiNardo. "In particular he has sought to improve protection for conscience rights, and to include programs of support for pregnant women and adoptive parents that we favor in their own right. However, these improvements do not change the fundamental problem with the Senate bill: Despite repeated claims to the contrary, it does not comply with longstanding Hyde restrictions on federal funding of elective abortions and health plans that include them."
Cardinal DiNardo had written to the Senate on December 14, saying that "the Catholic bishops of the United States strongly support authentic reform of our ailing health care system." His letter cited "three moral criteria for reform: respect for life and conscience; affordability for the poor; and access to much-needed basic health care for immigrants," noting that so far the Senate bill "has fallen short of the example set by the House version of this legislation in each of these areas."
On abortion funding, the Cardinal urged the Senate to "incorporate into this bill the longstanding and widely supported policies of current law, acknowledged and reaffirmed by the Senate itself" when it approved the Consolidated Appropriations Act for the new fiscal year on December 13. This Act reaffirmed the Hyde amendment and other laws that exclude elective abortions from health plans receiving federal funds -- including the plans that cover the Senators themselves and all other federal employees. The Senate so far has failed to reflect this same policy in its health care bill as the House has done, he said [see www.usccb.org/healthcare/DiNardo_1214_letter.pdf]Cardinal DiNardo said December 18: "We continue to oppose and urge others to oppose the Senate bill unless and until this fundamental failure is remedied. And whatever the immediate outcome in the Senate, we will continue to work for health care reform which truly protects the life, dignity, conscience and health of all. As the bishops have said many times, 'providing affordable and accessible health care that clearly reflects these fundamental principles is a public good, moral imperative and urgent national priority.' In particular we will work vigorously to ensure that the substance of the House's provision on abortion funding is included in final legislation. A special debt of gratitude is owed to House and Senate members, especially Rep. Bart Stupak (D-MI) and Sen. Ben Nelson (D-NE), who have placed their votes and reputation on the line to stand up for unborn children. Making this legislation consistent with longstanding federal law on abortion will not threaten needed authentic reform, but will help ensure its passage."--
Keywords: abortion, affordability, Senate, Cardinal Daniel DiNardo, Bishop William Murphy, Bishop John Wester, immigrants, Catholic Bishops, United States Conference of Catholic Bishops
09-264JUNE 2010 Study Presented on
Autism and Vaccines Using Cells
From Babies From Abortion
by Steven Ertelt
LifeNews.com Editor
June 3, 2010Washington, DC (LifeNews.com) --
A controversial study into the possible link between the use of cells form babies victimized by abortions in vaccines and an increase in autism rates was presented late last month to the International Meeting for Autism Research in Philadelphia.Dr. Theresa Deisher, the founder and lead scientist of the Sound Choice Pharmaceutical Institute (SCPI), which conducted the study, presented the paper touching on the apparent link found in childhood immunizations with Autism and Austim Spectrum Disorder.
The study, which Deisher said was "met with both shock and gratitude," focused on "improper integration of the residual DNA as a possible contributor to autism, particularly in genetically susceptible infants."
Full story at LifeNews.com http://www.lifenews.com/nat6392.html)
Diocese of Baker
PO Box 5999
Bend, OR 97708-5999
(541) 388-4004
Contact Us